Home
About Us
Practice Areas
Contact Us
 
 
 

AREAS OF PRACTICE

Personal Injuries
Brain injuries
burn injuries
Product Liability
trucking accidents
auto accidents
wrongful death
train/metrolink accidents
 

Ledger Law & Associates Helpful Links

LEDGER LAW LINKS
LEDGER LAW BLOGS

Nationally Recognized Case Results!


Arizona helicopter crash kills six –(Handled by Ledgerlaw’s Arizona Counsel Beryl Lane, Esq.) Tribune wire reports 9:25 AM CDT, June 30, 2008 A helicopter ferrying a patient with a medical emergency from the Grand Canyon collided into another chopper carrying a patient near a northern Arizona hospital, leaving six people dead and critically injuring a nurse. The collision Sunday east of Flagstaff Medical Center was a few hundred yards away from a neighborhood that was spared the falling debris. Officials said they were unable to provide an account of what preceded the crash. Lawrence Garduno, who lives about a half mile from the crash, said he heard a loud boom that rattled the windows. He drove toward the hospital and stopped to see the burning wreckage. "It kind of scares me," Garduno said. "If this had happened a half mile closer, it could have fallen on our house." An explosion on one of the aircraft after the crash injured two emergency workers who arrived with a ground ambulance company. They suffered minor burns and were spending the night at the hospital, but their injuries were not life-threatening. The crash, about 130 miles north of Phoenix, also sparked a 10-acre brush fire that was contained. One of the helicopters was operated by Air Methods from Englewood, Colo., and the other was from Classic Helicopters of Woods Cross, Utah. Both aircraft were Bell 407 models, said Ian Gregor, a spokesman with the Federal Aviation Administration. Three people on the Air Methods aircraft, including the patient, died. On the Classic helicopter, the pilot, paramedic and patient all died. A flight nurse on the Classic helicopter suffered extensive injuries and was in critical condition at the hospital. Matt Stein, a program director and lead pilot with Classic Helicopters subsidiary Classic Lifeguard Aeromedical Services in Page, Ariz., said his company's crew was landing at Flagstaff Medical Center carrying a patient with a medical emergency from the Grand Canyon's South Rim. "We've been in business 20 years, and these are the first fatalities we've experienced," Stein said. "They were all heroes. They were out doing a great service for their communities." Stein didn't tell The Associated Press the names of the crash victims, except to say that the pilot for Classic was experienced with more than 10,000 hours of flight time. He added that it's rare for two medical helicopters to attempt to land at a hospital at the same time. Flagstaff Medical Center doesn't have flight controllers, he said, and it's up to the pilots to watch each other as they approach. Air Methods officials didn't return calls from the AP on Sunday night. The helicopters spread debris across the scene. "They're not recognizable as helicopters," said Capt. Mark Johnson, a spokesman for the Flagstaff Fire Department. The FAA is sending inspectors to investigate. Hospital officials declined requests to interview the hospital president and the two burn victims. It was the largest loss of life involving helicopters in Arizona since two news helicopters collided last summer while covering an auto chase near Phoenix, killing all four people on board.


The Law Offices Ledger Law & Associates, Orange County, California's top wrongful death & personal injury law firm. Our experienced lawyers take a practical yet aggressive approach that allows our clients to receive the best outcome possible. Here are some of our nationally recognized case results!

Teen Injured by Truck Awarded $15 Million Represented by the Law Offices of Ledger & Associates in conjunction with The Law Offices of Panish Shea & Boyle

LOS ANGELES - A Superior Court jury has awarded more than $15 million in compensatory damages to a teenager who suffered permanent brain injuries after his mother's car was struck by a Southern California Gas Co. truck in 2005.

Thursday's verdict followed an admission of liability from the utility provider, which asked the jury to return with a payout well below eight figures. Charlotte Tilton and Kyle Tilton v. Southern California Gas Company, BC367753 (L.A. Super. Ct., May 1, 2008).

Kyle Tilton, now 17, was a passenger in the family's Chrysler sedan when it was hit by a gas company-owned pickup truck.

Tilton's mother was making a left turn along state Route 62, in Twentynine Palms, when the truck's driver ran a red light and hit the passenger side of her vehicle.

Gas company employee Darryl Whitley admitted fault for the accident, saying he had not noticed the light change.

Tilton, then 14, was struck in the head by a door frame and pushed against a console. Almost half of his body was compressed.

"It impacted right where he was sitting. It was like being in a trash compactor," said the plaintiffs' attorney, Brian Panish, of Panish, Shea & Boyle. "It was a very horrific impact."

Tilton was comatose for 24 hours and spent nine days in the hospital. He was diagnosed with a permanent frontal-lobe brain injury, which left him cognitively disabled with impaired judgement and an inability to regulate his moods, his lawyers said.

He also retained a drooping left eye, partial face paralysis and a six-inch scar on his head.

Tilton was an active teenager before the accident, earning As and Bs in school and enjoying dirt biking, skateboarding and repairing bicycles. He testified at trial that his personality "completely changed" after the accident.

He said he suffers from depression, lacks ambition and can no longer engage in many physical activities. He also reportedly suffers from fatigue, anxiety and speech difficulties. "He's just much slower processing all functions - if he's holding something in two hands, he will drop one thing," Panish said.

With liability in the crash established, damages became the main issue at trial.

Lawyers for Sempra Energy/OGC, which owns Southern California Gas Co., argued Tilton should be owed around $1 million for past and future pain and suffering, plus the cost of three years of future care. They ascribed $50,000 for lost future wages.

But the Los Angeles jury came back with damages totaling almost $15.1 million, including $10 million in past and future pain and suffering, $3.57 million in future medical expenses and $1 million in future loss of earnings.

Sempra Energy/OGC lawyer, Marlin Howes, could not immediately be reached for comment Thursday, though a spokeswoman said the company accepted responsibility for the "tragedy."

Expecting a payout, Tilton recently checked into a live-in physical rehabilitation facility, where he is undergoing daily therapy and trying to complete his high school education, Panish said.

"Kyle has a long way to go in his recovery, but we have worked hard to ensure that he is getting the best brain injury rehabilitation available," Panish said. "With this verdict, Kyle will be able to continue his treatment in the hopes that he can further recover and improve the quality of his life."



MILITARY: Acquitted former Marine recalls fear in Fallujah

A former Camp Pendleton Marine acquitted last week in the slaying of four detainees during a 2004 battle for the city of Fallujah, Iraq, says his most vivid memory of those days was "constant fear."

"We were running out of ammo and we weren't able to clear every house," Jose L. Nazario Jr. said Friday, one day after a U.S. District Court civilian jury declared him not guilty of manslaughter and related charges in the first-ever trial of its kind. "We were moving past buildings and structures where we could have been ambushed at any time."

It was that environment that Nazario confronted on the first of what would be 10 straight days of combat. But it would be that first day, his first time in combat, that would come back to haunt Nazario two years later.

The 28-year-old former sergeant from Camp Pendleton's 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment was indicted by a federal grand jury last year, accused of killing two of the detainees his squad encountered in a home they searched and directing junior Marines to kill two others.

He is the first former service member to be tried under the Military Extraterritorial Judicial Act authorized by Congress eight years ago. A provision allows federal prosecutions of people out of the military when accusations arise against them for actions during their active-duty years.

But the Nazario case was rife with problems for prosecutors. "The government had no bodies, no names to attach to the dead, no complaining witnesses and no physical evidence of any kind," said Attorney Emery Ledger, one of Nazario's three Attorneys.

What decision-makers in the Justice Department did have were statements from squad members that the detainees did not pose a threat when they were shot.

Faced with those statements, deciding to prosecute Nazario was based more on the moral and ethical imperative than overwhelming evidence, according to those who practice and study military law.

Civilian jurors

One military law expert said Nazario's case was exactly what the Military Extraterritorial Judicial Act was intended to cover.

"He could not be prosecuted in a military court-martial, so this was the only available option and it was perfectly appropriate for a civilian jury to hear the case," said Scott Silliman, a former U.S. Air Force attorney and Duke University law professor who heads its Center on Law, Ethics and National Security.

"Regardless of the verdict, the law worked in this case because an alleged crime was tried in court and a decision was reached."

Without the law, Nazario could not have been prosecuted by any court and that was not in the best interest of justice, he said.

Going into the case, Nazario's attorneys contended it was an inappropriate matter for a civilian jury. Without understanding the exigencies of the battlefield and the pressures troops faced, civilian jurors lacked the proper context, they argued.

On Friday, one of those attorneys reiterated that stance.

"The law has a devastating impact because the message it sends to troops is that you'd better be right because we are going to Monday-morning quarterback you for the rest of your life," said Joseph Preis, a former Marine who along with three other attorneys represented Nazario free of charge.

"We should be up front with recruits now and tell them we are going to give you a weapon, put you through hell and you better be aware that we are going to review every one of your actions in war and you could be charged with a crime years from now."

Preis said Nazario's legal team is considering asking Congress to amend the act so the military would be the only entity that can bring cases against former service members.

"It needs to be kept out of the civilian courts because it's just too difficult for jurors lacking military experience to be put in that position," Preis said.

Silliman disagreed.

"There just aren't going to be very many cases like Nazario's," he said during a telephone interview. "The law worked as it was intended."

'Too far'

Bing West, a former Marine officer who has written three books on the Iraq war, including the just-released "The Strongest Tribe: War, Politics and the Endgame in Iraq," said the Nazario case and similar ones brought against troops from Camp Pendleton in recent months represent a disturbing trend.

"We have gone entirely too far," said West, a former assistant secretary of defense. "We are attempting to place the same requirements on our soldiers and Marines in war that we place on police officers in the U.S. You simply cannot fight a major war that way."

The prosecutions, most of which have ended in withdrawal or dismissal of charges or outright acquittals such as Nazario's, are having an effect on the battlefield, said West, who recently returned from Iraq.

"It's leading to serious skepticism on the part of those who have to fight," he said during a telephone interview Friday. "When you get onto the battlefield and there are thousands of enemy fighters not wearing any uniform, you can't apply the same standards that we expect of our police forces.

"It seems like we want our troops to issue Miranda warnings and then collect and bag evidence in order to show what they did was proper."

Carlsbad attorney David Brahms, a former Marine general who once was the service's top legal adviser, said he sees a larger message in the Nazario verdict.

"The mothers of America spoke," he said of the nine women on the panel, one of whom told reporters she and other jurors did not think it was right for civilians to be deciding Nazario's fate. "They said, 'We don't think our boys should be put in jeopardy this way.' "

More legal troubles?

In a highly emotional and unusual aftermath of the verdict, several jurors walked from the jury room moments after their verdict was announced into the courtroom to shake Nazario's hand and express their support to his mother.

"They said, 'God bless you, you've got your life back and thank you for serving our country," Nazario said.

Although acquitted in the manslaughter trial, Nazario's legal troubles may not be over. The two members of the squad he was leading when the slayings occurred face trials at Camp Pendleton on charges of murder and dereliction of duty. While Nazario faced the possibility of 10 years or more in prison, the men he led face a possible life prison term.

Those men, Sgts. Ryan Weemer and Jermaine Nelson, defied a subpoena ordering them to testify at Nazario's trial and were cited by U.S. District Judge Stephen Larson with criminal contempt of court. They face a Sept. 29 hearing that will determine if that finding stands and what punishment they may face.

Now, legal experts say they fully expect Marine Corps prosecutors will subpoena Nazario and the Justice Department will issue him an immunity grant so that anything he might say cannot result in new charges against him. If he is subpoenaed, but refuses to testify, the experts say he could be held in contempt in federal court.

Unlike Nazario, Nelson and Weemer will have their cases heard by a military jury. And unlike in federal court where a unanimous decision was required of the 12 jurors, two-thirds of a military panel agreeing on guilt or innocence is sufficient to reach a verdict.

For at least a few hours on Friday, none of that much mattered for Nazario, a married father of a 2-year-old child. He was attending a celebration at his attorneys' Orange County offices and looking forward to being reunited with his wife and son in New York.

"I'm just looking forward to getting home and carrying on with my life," he said.


voicemail

 Contact Information


THE FIRM TO CALL WHEN YOUR FUTURE IS AT STAKE

Tel: (800) 300-0001